From 57e597117cea274d4b010a540ea192986ed8bb41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quantum <quantum2048@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 18:12:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Add GitHub sponsors

---
 src/index.ejs | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/index.ejs b/src/index.ejs
index d670957..ec3bc3e 100644
--- a/src/index.ejs
+++ b/src/index.ejs
@@ -193,6 +193,20 @@
       </ol>
     </div>
   </div>
+  <div class="card">
+    <div class="card-body">
+      <h5 class="card-title">I like this website. How can I support you?</h5>
+      <p class="card-text">
+        For security reasons, this website will <b>NEVER</b> serve ads. Unfortunately, servers and domains are not free,
+        though I try to be as economical as I can. I would rather lose money running this public service than serve
+        ads or shut it down, but if you would like to help me offset the costs, feel free to send some money my way
+        on:
+      </p>
+      <ul>
+        <li><a href="https://github.com/sponsors/quantum5">GitHub Sponsors</a></li>
+      </ul>
+    </div>
+  </div>
   <div class="card">
     <div class="card-body">
       <h5 class="card-title">Bruce Schneier says this password scheme is broken. Is it?</h5>
@@ -206,8 +220,8 @@
           individual words like "correcthorsebatterystaple" -- is no longer good advice. The password crackers are on to
           this trick.</p>
         <footer class="blockquote-footer">Bruce Schneier, <cite title="Source Title"><a
-            href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/03/choosing_secure_1.html" rel="nofollow">Choosing Secure
-          Passwords</a></cite></footer>
+                    href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/03/choosing_secure_1.html" rel="nofollow">Choosing Secure
+              Passwords</a></cite></footer>
       </blockquote>
       <p class="card-text">
         Excuse me, Bruce, but the entropy calculation for this password scheme is based on the absolute worst case